
First: As I see a huge number of favs in my messages and I'm unfortunately lacking time to answer them all and say thank you personally to each and one of you... Thank you! I really apriciate them and it makes my heart sing to see that you like my works this much. Thank you

Now. An icon problem issue. Only few thoughts.
After I had this little touchy incident with one about my user icon here, I have become quite interested, which side is right and at to what point fighting for what is right brings results. Well, I'm not going deeper in that, still, I've started going through old pictures I foolishly have downloaded at the beginning of my years around the net and see if I can trace them to the originals. Some of them I did and some of them I didn't.
The question that actually rised from it was, at what point in publishing their art, does the art become the so-called public property?
The easy answer is NEVER! But we're not after easy answers here.
Let's take Angel Sanctuary as an example here. We all know Yuki Kaori, right? If you don't, just google for her. And that's where the problems start - just google for her and you get to know her, you get the exaltation of her beautiful art, you "collect" it and then wanna show your new ecstasy tablet to everyone and you make it into an icon, thinking nothing more of it. I know, 'cause livejournal and blogger itself are full of this. Plus countless fansites that are nothing more than copypaste joys. Then you referre to the artist (the nice give me credit clause) and think it's ok.
Is it ok? To some point, sure it's ok - from artist's point of view you get a free add. Then their work get more viewers and you get to publish something and then even that precious little icon someone made out from job is suddenly a moneymaker and then it's not ok by so many facts and laws. Yet that's the point where you get famous and the net is suddenly flooded with tiny iconmakers, who also consider the cutout/added text icons as their art.
Ignorance is the keyword here. I can't say carelessness, because I think, when the young artist (preteen, teenager, newby) made it, they hardly thought bad of it, but they read the clause about not using other's art and pass it as sniff during a storm. The other end would be the IT-intelligence, who knowingly use other people's art, because it referres to them so neatly, aka porn, sick insulting slogans, twisted ideologies, twisted signs, art... And that's because to them, internet is the ultimate free source and many (I wish I had made that one up myself!) think that if it's in the net, it's meant for everyone everywhere.
So, where do you draw the line, when searching for new icon? At what point do you say, or sense as we hardly ever stop there, that this artist and his/hers work have become a public property? Where do we stop asking permission to use someone's work, because they probably don't have time among all the fans surrounding them to answer or because it's not for money making purpose, it's allowed?
I'd like to say I'm free from this sin, but I can't. But I do say if we want to fight against it, a huge ethical issue has been left out from our education on IT. It's called plagiarism. We talk about it in our literature classes, but how many of you actually relate it with internet and arts? With user icons? IT is meant to teach techincal problems to our kids and youth, so they don't even think this issue should be adressed at all. And unless you yourself become one of the fighting artists, you don't really care and keep allowing yourself that innocent flirt with plagiarism.
So, take the quiz at

account now and let's see, where do you draw the line? Mine is getting thicker every minute. Alowing your works to be used on non-profitable purposes is a good thing, but why do those same people are against icons, I don't know. It's probably yet again personal if we allow it or not, if we ask for credit and are happy with it or not and if we sense the point, from which on we just let it go as there is no stop to the flow of icons that all clame to be art.
Comments if you have ideas to add and show me the new light on matters.